• Subscribe
  • /
  • Login
AggreStrat
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Global Overview
  • Regions
    • Central and South Asia
    • East Asia and Pacific
    • Europe & Eurasia
    • Near East
    • Sub-Saharan Africa
    • Western Hemisphere
  • Topics
    • Cyber Security
    • Economic Trends
    • Education
    • Enviornment, Climate Change, and Sustainability
    • Foreign Affairs
    • Global Commerce and Transportation
    • Instability, Extremism, and Terrorism
    • Medical Research and Healthcare
    • Security Cooperation and Military Strategy
  • Links
    • Google Scholar
    • Think Tank Watch
  • Contact Us

Categorization-Based Spatial Voting

Quarterly Journal of Political Science (QJPS) | 29/06/2011

Abstract

Experimental research shows that while most voters have some form of spatial preferences, individuals differ in the type of spatial preferences they have: many voters prefer candidates closer to themselves in a policy space (proximity voting), others prefer candidates that are on the same side of an issue as themselves (directional voting), and still others prefer those who will move policy closest to them (discounted proximity voting). No existing theory explains this variation. I propose a theory based on the idea that people categorize candidates and have preferences defined over categories. As a voter gains political experience, he/she makes finer distinctions between candidates, and the set of categories grows. In this way, voters move from either–or conceptions of politics that approximate directional preferences toward more detailed conceptions consistent with proximity preferences, with some cases approximating discounted proximity voting as well. I show that the categorization model accurately predicts the observed frequencies of different voting types as well as some of the observed comparative statics and observed differences in the distribution of voting types across different policy areas.

Suggested Citation

Nathan A. Collins (2011), "Categorization-Based Spatial Voting", Quarterly Journal of Political Science: Vol. 5: No. 4, pp 357-370. http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/100.00010062

Read more >>

Posted on:

General | Journals |








    ABOUT AGGRESTRAT

    The Aggregation of Strategy and Foreign Policy

    We at AggreStrat believe that the best decisions are informed decisions.

    AggreStrat strives to bring together the world’s best think tanks, professional periodicals, academic journals, and government statements together in one place for quick review.

    Through quickly collecting and correlating information, decision-makers and researchers can find the subjects and content produces they need quickly to be informed and ready.

    AggreStrat Admin

    admin@aggrestrat.com

    Social Links
    tag cloud
    East Asian and Pacific European and Eurasian Near East South and Central Asia Sub-Saharan Africa Western Hemisphere
    • Home
    • Archive
    • Search
    Copyright 2019 © AggreStrat | All Rights Reserved

    Powered by