• Subscribe
  • /
  • Login
AggreStrat
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Global Overview
  • Regions
    • Central and South Asia
    • East Asia and Pacific
    • Europe & Eurasia
    • Near East
    • Sub-Saharan Africa
    • Western Hemisphere
  • Topics
    • Cyber Security
    • Economic Trends
    • Education
    • Enviornment, Climate Change, and Sustainability
    • Foreign Affairs
    • Global Commerce and Transportation
    • Instability, Extremism, and Terrorism
    • Medical Research and Healthcare
    • Security Cooperation and Military Strategy
  • Links
    • Google Scholar
    • Think Tank Watch
  • Contact Us

Party and Incumbency Cues in Voting: Are They Substitutes?

Party and Incumbency Cues in Voting: Are They Substitutes? | 02/03/2006

Abstract

A possible explanation for the rise of the incumbency advantage in U.S. elections asserts that party and incumbency are close informational substitutes. A common claim in the literature is that, as the salience of partisan cues decreased, voters attached themselves to the next available piece of information – incumbency. Minnesota state legislative elections provide a unique setting for testing this idea. These elections switched from using non-partisan to partisan ballots and primaries in 1973. We find that, after the switch to partisan elections, party voting increased substantially. However, contrary to expectations, the incumbency advantage also increased. These patterns suggest that party and incumbency are not close substitutes for large numbers of voters, and that cue-substitution cannot explain the rise of the incumbency advantage.

Suggested Citation

Stephen Ansolabehere, Shigeo Hirano, James M. Snyder Jr and Michiko Ueda (2006), "Party and Incumbency Cues in Voting: Are They Substitutes?", Quarterly Journal of Political Science: Vol. 1: No. 2, pp 119-137. http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/100.00000008

Read more >>

Posted on:

General |








    ABOUT AGGRESTRAT

    The Aggregation of Strategy and Foreign Policy

    We at AggreStrat believe that the best decisions are informed decisions.

    AggreStrat strives to bring together the world’s best think tanks, professional periodicals, academic journals, and government statements together in one place for quick review.

    Through quickly collecting and correlating information, decision-makers and researchers can find the subjects and content produces they need quickly to be informed and ready.

    AggreStrat Admin

    admin@aggrestrat.com

    Social Links
    tag cloud
    East Asian and Pacific European and Eurasian Near East South and Central Asia Sub-Saharan Africa Western Hemisphere
    • Home
    • Archive
    • Search
    Copyright 2019 © AggreStrat | All Rights Reserved

    Powered by